<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>randys.org &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randys.org/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randys.org</link>
	<description>wasting your precious bandwidth since 1998</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:40:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Heinen $2.2M poorer, wants to put sugar in Jobs&#039; gas tank</title>
		<link>http://www.randys.org/2008/08/14/heinen-22m-poorer-wants-to-put-sugar-in-jobs-gas-tank/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=heinen-22m-poorer-wants-to-put-sugar-in-jobs-gas-tank</link>
		<comments>http://www.randys.org/2008/08/14/heinen-22m-poorer-wants-to-put-sugar-in-jobs-gas-tank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Nerdery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randys.org/2008/08/14/heinen-22m-poorer-wants-to-put-sugar-in-jobs-gas-tank/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember a while back the whole backdating thing at Apple? You know, where the CFO and former general counsel, [Nancy Heinen][1], [backdated stocks in 2001][2]? Yeah, that one. I didn&#8217;t really pay much attention to it when it came out. &#8230; <a href="http://www.randys.org/2008/08/14/heinen-22m-poorer-wants-to-put-sugar-in-jobs-gas-tank/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember a while back the whole backdating thing at Apple? You know, where the CFO and former general counsel, [Nancy Heinen][1], [backdated stocks in 2001][2]? Yeah, that one. I didn&#8217;t really pay much attention to it when it came out. I figure, someone making that kind of dough can handle whatever it is they dish out for themselves. Well, Heinen and SEC &#8220;settled&#8221; on an agreement that she pay some $2.2 million which includes more than $400K in interest and a $200K civil penalty. She released a statement today (through her lawyers of course).</p>
<p>> I cherish the great people I worked with at Apple, and am proud of my contributions to its historic turnaround and current success. With this lawsuit behind me, I look forward to addressing the greater challenges of social justice and economic disparity.<br />
><br />
> From [Former Apple general counsel Heinen agrees to $2.2M backdating settlement - East Bay Business Times][cite]</p>
<p>Hmmm, interesting. I don&#8217;t really think she feels that amicable about the whole ordeal. I actually have a copy of the *real* statement she wanted to release before her lawyers got a hold of it.</p>
<p>> I loath those pretentious freaks I worked with at Apple, and am pissed that those assholes didn&#8217;t have my back after all of my contributions to its historic turnaround and current success. With this bullshit behind me, I look forward to harassing Steve in the name of social justice and wish nothing but economic disparity on his whole family. Thanks for nothing asshat!</p>
<p>You heard it here first&#8230;</p>
<p>[1]:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_R._Heinen<br />
[2]:http://bit.ly/HrPrA<br />
[cite]:http://www.bizjournals.com/eastbay/stories/2008/08/11/daily67.html</p>
<div style=" text-align: center;  margin: 8px; ">
				<script type="text/javascript">
				google_ad_client = "pub-6476605957445525";
				google_ad_width = 468;
				google_ad_height = 60;
				google_ad_format = "468x60_as";
				google_ad_type = "text_image";
				google_ad_channel = "8409641020";
				google_color_border = "#C7C7C7";
				google_color_bg = "#FFFFFF";
				google_color_link = "#777777";
				google_color_text = "#777777";
				google_color_url = "#3333CC";
				google_ui_features = "rc:0";
				</script>
				<script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"></script>
			</div><!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.randys.org/2008/08/14/heinen-22m-poorer-wants-to-put-sugar-in-jobs-gas-tank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#039;s iPhone 3G Not So Cheap Afterall, AT&amp;T Gets The Skins</title>
		<link>http://www.randys.org/2008/06/09/apples-iphone-3g-not-so-cheap-afterall-att-gets-the-skins/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=apples-iphone-3g-not-so-cheap-afterall-att-gets-the-skins</link>
		<comments>http://www.randys.org/2008/06/09/apples-iphone-3g-not-so-cheap-afterall-att-gets-the-skins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Nerdery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randys.org/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today saw the announcement of the new 3G [iPhone][1] from [Apple][2]. It looks very promissing and the price cut to $199 USD sounds like a really good price point to get more people to jump on the iPhone bandwagon. Afterall, &#8230; <a href="http://www.randys.org/2008/06/09/apples-iphone-3g-not-so-cheap-afterall-att-gets-the-skins/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today saw the announcement of the new 3G [iPhone][1] from [Apple][2]. It looks very promissing and the price cut to $199 USD sounds like a really good price point to get more people to jump on the iPhone bandwagon. Afterall, this thing is [twice as fast][3], but [half the cost][4].</p>
<p>[1]: http://www.apple.com/iphone/ &#8220;The new Apple iPhone 3G&#8221;<br />
[2]: http://www.apple.com/<br />
[3]: http://www.apple.com/iphone/features/wireless.html<br />
[4]: http://www.apple.com/iphone/gallery/ads/hallway/</p>
<p>What was not mentioned in Job&#8217;s keynote was [AT&#038;T's iPhone _3G_ plan pricing][5]. And, why should they; AT&#038;T and Apple have severed their revenue sharing deal they had with the initial iPhone release one year ago. However, don&#8217;t let the $200 discount on a new iPhone fool you. Let&#8217;s do some math&#8230;</p>
<p>The old iPhone plans started at $59.99/mo. If you signed a two year contract you would pay roughly $1,440 over the life of the contract. The new plans, according to the press release, start at $39.99 voice plan PLUS $30 per month for unlimited data. Now you&#8217;re looking at $1,680 over the live of the contract. That&#8217;s $240 _more_ (per contract) than the previous iPhone plans. Still feel like you&#8217;re getting a good deal? You just spent $240 to save $200. No word on family plan pricing or if they have family plans for the iPhone.</p>
<p>[5]:http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&#038;cdvn=news&#038;newsarticleid=25791</p>
<p>Will I get one? Probably. :\</p>
<p>**Update**: Looks like there&#8217;s [no special treatment for new iPhone users][6] and the standard plans and rates apply. It makes it a little easier to swallow a family plan at $59.99/mo for two lines of service but I have yet to find out if the family plan is available for the iPhone 3G. Interesting thing I found looking for [answers][7] to the question [_What plans are available for the iPhone?_][8] I Suppose they should update this if it&#8217;s not true.</p>
<p>**Update #2**: I just spoke with a Karen George in AT&#038;T customer service and from what she told me the iPhone plan is the same, just going up in price $10/mo (this kind of contradicts the press release though). She also confirmed that the family plans _are_ available for the new iPhone. I asked if the new iPhone plans will still include the 200 text messages and she said yes. I also asked if the MEdia(TM) Max Unlimited data plan (which, at $35/mo includes unlimited data and texts, seems to be a better deal) would be available for the iPhone and she said yes. I&#8217;m a little skeptical about what some random customer service rep says at this point, so take it with a grain of salt. Especially when she tells me they (customer service?) are not being told ANYthing about the details of the new iPhone and/or plans.</p>
<p>[6]:http://gizmodo.com/5014764/iphone-3g-pricing-and-activation-details-30-unlimited-data-activated-in-store-only<br />
[7]:http://www.wireless.att.com/answer-center/main.jsp<br />
[8]:http://www.wireless.att.com/answer-center/main.jsp?t=solutionTab&#038;ft=searchTab&#038;ps=solutionPanels&#038;locale=en_US&#038;_dyncharset=UTF-8&#038;solutionId=60986&#038;isSrch=Yes</p>
<p>**NB**: If you&#8217;re wondering about the &#8216;AT&#038;T Gets the Skins&#8217; bit of the title, I&#8217;m referring to the [San Bromista Cat Ranch][7].</p>
<p>[7]: http://www.porcinefund.com/catranch/catranchx.htm</p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.randys.org/2008/06/09/apples-iphone-3g-not-so-cheap-afterall-att-gets-the-skins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Old Is Your Login?</title>
		<link>http://www.randys.org/2007/10/27/how-old-is-your-login/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-old-is-your-login</link>
		<comments>http://www.randys.org/2007/10/27/how-old-is-your-login/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>randy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Nerdery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randomness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randys.org//2007/10/27/how-old-is-your-login</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See here, Bullet point number one: Logging in with an account originally created in Mac OS X 10.1 or earlier that has a password of 8 or more characters. Mac OS X 10.1 came out just over six years ago &#8230; <a href="http://www.randys.org/2007/10/27/how-old-is-your-login/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See <a href="http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=306804">here</a>, Bullet point number one:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Logging in with an account originally created in Mac OS X 10.1 or earlier that has a password of 8 or more characters.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Mac OS X 10.1 came out just over six years ago in 2001. If you&#8217;ve been using the &#8220;upgrade&#8221; option every time you update your OS X version, I think it&#8217;s time you performed a fresh install. Especially on such an old system (what do you have, an original Quicksilver? No? Older?). If you&#8217;ve made it this long without having to do a clean install, congratulations. You&#8217;re one of very small number of people. Hell, I haven&#8217;t kept a computer for longer than two or three years.</p>
<p>I bought my first Apple in 1997 &#8212; PowerPC G3 300Mhz (of the Beige kind). I bought my second Apple in 2000 &#8212; Quicksilver 733Mhz (non-shiny doors). Sold the G3 in 2002 (or so). I bought my first Powerbook in 2003 (G4 1Ghz Titanium) slightly used from a nice girl (with buyer&#8217;s remorse) in San Francisco. It <a href="http://www.randys.org/2005/8/26/the-mac-is-on-the-blink">took a dump</a> about two years ago and I succumbed to way of cheap x86 hardware and Linux. But I redeemed myself about a year and a half ago when I bought my second Apple laptop (Macbook Pro 2.16Ghz).</p>
<p>I digress. What I&#8217;m saying is that, even if you&#8217;re lucky enough to have the same computer for the last six years (or more), I doubt you&#8217;d be as lucky going through four separate system upgrades (assuming you upgraded every version). Even if you didn&#8217;t and you went from 10.1 directly to 10.5, I highly doubt Apple spent much time testing that upgrade path (if at all). </p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.randys.org/2007/10/27/how-old-is-your-login/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

